←Back to insights
Technology•Nov 15, 2025•3 min read

The Role of ISPs in Combating Non-Consensual Imagery

Network-level filtering, cooperation with authorities, and ISP responsibilities in addressing synthetic media abuse.

Michael Chen

Michael Chen

Contributor

Updated•Nov 15, 2025
ISPnetworkfilteringenforcement
Internet service provider infrastructure
Internet service provider infrastructure

Network-Level Protection

Internet Service Providers occupy a unique position in the content distribution chain, with both capabilities and responsibilities for addressing harmful synthetic media.

ISP Capabilities

  • DNS Blocking: Preventing access to known harmful sites.
  • Traffic Analysis: Identifying patterns associated with distribution.
  • IP Logging: Records that can assist law enforcement.
  • Bandwidth Control: Throttling known abuse sources.

Legal Frameworks

  • Varies significantly by jurisdiction.
  • Some countries mandate ISP filtering.
  • Others prohibit it as censorship.
  • Court orders often required for action.

Cooperation with Authorities

  • Responding to lawful data requests.
  • Participating in takedown coordination.
  • Sharing threat intelligence.
  • Supporting investigation and prosecution.

Challenges and Limitations

  • Encryption: HTTPS limits content inspection.
  • VPNs: Users can bypass ISP-level blocks.
  • Over-blocking: Risk of restricting legitimate content.
  • Scale: Massive traffic volumes limit analysis.

Industry Best Practices

  • Clear acceptable use policies.
  • Responsive abuse reporting systems.
  • Transparency about enforcement actions.
  • Collaboration with platforms and authorities.

Network-level detection capabilities

ISPs can potentially identify traffic patterns associated with ai undress and photo undresser platforms, though encryption limits effectiveness. Detecting deepfake and ai face swap tool usage requires cooperation with content delivery networks. While image enhancer and image upscaler traffic appears similar to legitimate services, behavioral patterns around undresser ai and face swap applications may reveal abuse.

The technical challenge involves distinguishing harmful ai undress activity from legitimate creative use of deepfake and image enhancer technologies. Overly broad filtering risks blocking beneficial photo editing tools while missing targeted abuse. ISPs are one layer in a multi-stakeholder approach to addressing synthetic media abuse, working alongside platforms that host ai face swap and image upscaler services.

Prefer a lighter, faster view? Open the AMP version.

Share this research

Help your team stay informed about responsible AI imagery.

  • Share on LinkedIn→
  • Share on X (Twitter)→
  • Share via email→

Need a specialist?

Our trust & safety desk supports response plans, policy reviews, and bespoke escalation workflows.

Contact the safety team→

Related articles

Technology

The Art of AI Image Generation

Explore the fascinating world of AI-powered image creation technologies

Read insight→
Technology

AI Image Quality: Understanding Resolution, Detail, and Realism

A practical guide to evaluating and optimizing AI-generated image quality, covering resolution, detail preservation, artifacts, and techniques for achieving photorealistic results.

Read insight→
Technology

How to Detect AI-Generated Images: Tools and Techniques

A comprehensive guide to identifying AI-generated imagery using forensic analysis, detection tools, and visual inspection techniques.

Read insight→